What can be done · Monitoring
Who is watching the ocean?
About 8,000 floats, buoys, ships and tide gauges report from the ocean, more than half of them run by the United States. Most measure the surface or the top 2,000 m. The big changes play out where coverage is thin: the deep ocean, around Antarctica, in winter and along coasts. The direct record of the Atlantic circulation starts only in 2004.
Coverage
Gaps in monitoring for each big change
The map looks crowded, but each network was built for a particular job: weather forecasts, seasonal forecasts, the heat in the upper ocean. Most were designed for the top 2,000 m of the open, ice-free ocean, over months to years. The big changes happen largely outside that design: in the deep ocean, next to Antarctic ice, in high-latitude winters, along coasts, and in trends that take decades to emerge.
The system today
Status of the global observing system
- 9,389platforms in the Global Ocean Observing System, from 64 contributing countries, making more than 120,000 observations a day (GOOS, 2025). The map above shows only platforms OceanOPS lists as currently operating, plus the GLOSS core tide gauges.
- 55%of the way to a complete Argo array: global, full-depth, and measuring chemistry and biology as well as heat (GOOS, 2025).
- Over halfof the world’s ocean temperature profiles come from the United States. Removing them would raise the error in the ocean heating rate by 163% (Zhu et al., 2026).
- 83%of the multi-sensor biogeochemical floats now operating are US floats, funded by a project that ends in October 2026 (GO-BGC).
Against each network’s own target, Argo and weather-reporting ships are above 85%, drifting buoys and repeat ship surveys 70–85%, tide gauges, coastal radars and gliders 30–50%. GOOS rates the system as “subcritical”, with declining drifting buoy and ship-based observations, reliance on a few contributors and no secure long-term funding (GOOS 2025 Status Report). Removing all US data would degrade ocean heat monitoring more than removing 80% of all data at random (Zhu et al., 2026).
Satellites and sensors in the water
Satellite and in-water observations compared
From space
Satellites see the surface of the whole ocean, often every day.
- Sea-surface temperature: marine heatwaves and coral bleaching alerts.
- Sea level: the rise of the ocean and the shape of currents, from radar altimeters.
- Ocean colour: algae and productivity near the surface.
- Sea ice, surface salinity and winds.
- Ships at sea: radar and optical images reveal fishing vessels that do not broadcast their position.
Only from inside the ocean
Most of the ocean’s heat, carbon and movement lies below the surface, out of a satellite’s view.
- Heat below the surface, which sets up El Niño and marine heatwaves months ahead.
- Ocean heat content, the main measure of how fast the planet is gaining energy.
- The Atlantic overturning, measured by moored arrays across whole ocean basins.
- Carbon, oxygen and nutrients at depth, from biogeochemical floats and research ships.
- Sea level at the coast, where people live, from tide gauges.
Why continuity matters
Long-term decisions rest on short records
Decisions that are revisited often, such as coral bleaching alerts, can draw on satellite records several decades long. Seasonal forecasts of El Niño and marine heatwaves need heat measured below the surface by moorings and floats.
Decisions that play out over decades, on the Atlantic circulation, the carbon budget and the ocean carbon sink, rest on direct records only 12 to 22 years long. Direct measurement of the Atlantic circulation began in 2004 at 26.5°N and in 2014 in the subpolar North Atlantic. Earlier changes have to be inferred from indirect evidence, and those inferences disagree.
For these decisions a gap cannot be made up later. A missing year at 26.5°N is a year permanently lost from a record that is already too short to separate a trend from natural swings.
- Adaptation
- Mitigation
- Disaster risk
- Marine protection
- ○ mainly satellite
- ◐ mixed
- ● mainly in situ
- Satellite record
- Direct (in situ) record
- Partial coverage
- Reduced data return
- ✕ US funding ends October 2026

2026
Funding changes in 2026
The US National Science Foundation begins removing four of the five arrays of its Ocean Observatories Initiative, including the Irminger Sea array south of Greenland.
After the US Senate passes a bill to save the observatories, NSF stops the removal; one array already out of the water is to be redeployed.
The GO-BGC project, which deployed most of the world’s biogeochemical floats, confirms it will end on 31 October 2026 with no near-term US deployments planned.
The European Union and Canada launch the OceanEye International Alliance for the Global Ocean Observing System in New York: 30 countries and the EU, with pledges of at least €211 million.
OceanEye
OceanEye is an EU initiative, announced in March 2026, to strengthen global ocean observation. Its international alliance, co-chaired at launch by the President of the European Commission and the Prime Minister of Canada and organised with UNESCO’s Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and the World Meteorological Organization, aims to maintain existing platforms, close data gaps and strengthen the coordination of the Global Ocean Observing System, including OceanOPS. Members include ocean countries from every region, among them Angola, Brazil, Cabo Verde, Madagascar, Mauritius, Namibia and Palau. Further pledges are expected at COP31, the Our Ocean Conference and the 2028 UN Ocean Conference.
Sources: European Commission, Reinforcing global ocean observation; Prime Minister of Canada, 23 September 2026. The Commission’s press release of 24 September gives “almost €220 million”.
What would make it stronger
Treat ocean observation as critical infrastructure
Protect the long records
A gap in a seasonal forecast input degrades one season’s forecasts. A gap in the Atlantic circulation arrays, deep and biogeochemical floats, repeat ship surveys or long tide-gauge records is permanent. These are best funded through stable, multi-year arrangements.
Connect observations to decisions
Observations deliver most when observing needs are set with the people who act on them, and when monitoring is linked to decision points in adaptation plans, early action, risk finance and mitigation accounting, including in small island and coastal developing states.
Broaden who contributes
When losing one country’s data would do more harm than losing 80% of all data at random, the system is fragile. Lower-cost sensors, observations from commercial and fishing vessels, regional programmes and the capacity-building provisions of the High Seas Treaty can widen the base.
Keep the data open
Free, timely data sharing, as Argo has practised since 2000, is what turns individual national platforms into a global system that every country can use.
This section follows Jongman (forthcoming). Brenden Jongman is the curator of Ocean Turning Points.
About these data and sources
Map: platform positions from OceanOPS, the WMO-IOC centre for the Global Ocean Observing System, reproduced for non-commercial use with acknowledgement; refreshed weekly. Satellite missions are not shown.
Sources: Global Ocean Observing System, 2025 Status Report; Zhu et al. (2026), Nature Climate Change 16, 657–660; Argo (2000), Argo float data and metadata from the Global Data Assembly Centre, SEANOE, doi:10.17882/42182; GO-BGC project notice, 28 August 2026; US National Science Foundation, update on the Ocean Observatories Initiative, 18 June 2026; McCarthy et al. (2015), Progress in Oceanography 130; Lozier et al. (2019), Science 363, 516–521; IPCC AR6 Working Group I, Chapter 9; Lobelle et al. (2020), Geophysical Research Letters 47, e2020GL089974; McCarthy et al. (2025), Geophysical Research Letters 52, e2025GL115055; Gunnarsson et al. (2026), AMOC Observation as Critical Infrastructure, Reykjavik Institute (policy report); Owens et al. (2022), Marine Technology Society Journal 56(3), 84–90; Roemmich et al. (2019), Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 439; Argo Steering Team (2024), AST-25 report; Newman et al. (2019), Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 433; Moltmann et al. (2019), Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 291; Smith et al. (2019), Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 31; Souter et al. (eds) (2021), Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2020, GCRMN; NOAA Coral Reef Watch (2026); Hilborn et al. (2020), PNAS 117, 2218–2224; Bushinsky et al. (2019), Global Biogeochemical Cycles 33, 1370–1388; Friedlingstein et al. (2025), Global Carbon Budget 2024, Earth System Science Data 17, 965–1039; Jongman (forthcoming).